Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning campaign finance.
The Court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.
10 Ways Citizens United Endangers Democracy
- “Independent” Spending Farce Leads To SuperPACs
- Legal Money Laundering Increases Secret Spending
- Corporate Money Distorts Democracy
- Court is Blind to Reality of Corruption
- Citizen Voices are Drowned Out
- Money Is Still Not Speech
- Open Season on Remaining Money in Politics Protections
- Increases Corporate Power
- Unlimited Corporate Spending is Bad for Business and Shareholders
- Risks Reducing Respect for the Supreme Court
10 Ways Citizens United Endangers Democracy
Why “Citizens United” ruling was wrong?
Money Is Speech: Why the Citizens United v. FEC Ruling Is Bad for Politics and the Market
2019-11-05 Historic’ Alaska Ruling Could Provide Roadmap to Defeating Citizens United
2018-02-17 How Citizens United Continues to Transform Money in Politics
.
progressiveissuesblog 